Delaware vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Delaware
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Delaware
Celtics
22.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Delaware vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,602,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Delaware and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 0.90%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Delaware | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 65.9% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 24.1% | 33.1% |
| Median | 22.0% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 16.7% |
Demographics Similar to Delaware and Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Delaware are Immigrants from Liberia (22.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |