Chippewa vs Houma Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Houma
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Houma
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Houma Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,464 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.804 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 14.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Houma |
Minimum | 5.1% | 6.0% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 55.7% |
Range | 57.4% | 49.7% |
Mean | 22.5% | 19.1% |
Median | 18.2% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 18.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Houma by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Native/Alaskan (16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Ute (16.2%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 3.3%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |