Chippewa vs Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Israel
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Israel
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,801 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,930,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 35.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Israel |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 37.1% |
| Range | 57.4% | 36.6% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 10.2% |
| Median | 18.2% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |