Cheyenne vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Cheyenne
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Cheyenne
Chileans
26.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,342,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 74.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cheyenne | Chilean |
Minimum | 15.2% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
Range | 84.8% | 43.2% |
Mean | 43.8% | 16.2% |
Median | 38.5% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.4% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 39.1% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.8% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.3% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Crow (26.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 1.8%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 2.7%), Yuman (27.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |