Fijian vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Fijian
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Fijians
Chileans
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,823,808 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 23.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | Chilean |
Minimum | 4.3% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 44.7% | 48.3% |
Range | 40.5% | 43.2% |
Mean | 21.1% | 16.2% |
Median | 19.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Fijians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |