Celtic vs South American Indian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
South American Indian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
South American Indians
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
38.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs South American Indian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,455,459 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 9.1%, a difference of 3.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 32.2% |
| Range | 97.2% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 9.3% |
| Median | 9.4% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and South American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Uruguayan (9.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Morocco (9.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Hmong (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Uganda (9.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Iraq (9.1%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
| Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
| Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |
| Uruguayans | 39.2 /100 | #183 | Fair 9.1% |
| South American Indians | 38.7 /100 | #184 | Fair 9.1% |