Burmese vs Russian Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Russian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Russians
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Russian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,663,419 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Russian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 37.7% | 75.4% |
Range | 36.2% | 75.1% |
Mean | 9.3% | 14.6% |
Median | 8.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Russians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Iran (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |