Burmese vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Jordanian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Jordanians
15.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
74.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,001,827 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,384,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 56.5% |
| Range | 96.8% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 26.6% | 22.1% |
| Median | 15.4% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 28.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.9% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.7% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (15.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are South African (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Israel (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nigerian (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 83.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 81.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
| Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
| Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
| South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
| Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
| Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |