Burmese vs Fijian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Fijian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Fijians
15.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Fijian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,001,827 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,243,042 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.814 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Fijian |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 8.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 63.6% |
| Range | 96.8% | 55.2% |
| Mean | 26.6% | 23.1% |
| Median | 15.4% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.9% | 18.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.7% | 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Fijians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Brazilian (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Korea (15.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Immigrants from Chile (15.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), South American Indian (15.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Australian (15.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Fijians | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Chileans | 96.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| South American Indians | 96.2 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.7% |
| Australians | 96.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.7% |