Burmese vs Czech Family Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Czech
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Czechs
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Czech Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,390,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Czech |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 25.0% |
| Range | 28.8% | 23.4% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Czechs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |