Bolivian vs Czech Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Czech
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Czechs
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Czech Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,453,114 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,390,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Czech |
Minimum | 0.79% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 25.0% |
Range | 36.2% | 23.4% |
Mean | 7.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Czechs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Turkish (7.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |