British West Indian vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
British West Indian
Immigrants from Jordan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
British West Indians
Immigrants from Jordan
21.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,588,382 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,197,241 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 36.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 40.6% | 98.4% |
Mean | 20.4% | 19.3% |
Median | 19.6% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 16.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Seminole (21.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |