Bhutanese vs Okinawan Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Okinawan
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Bhutanese
Okinawans
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Okinawan Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,571,871 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Okinawan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 15.3% |
Range | 31.4% | 14.6% |
Mean | 10.2% | 6.5% |
Median | 8.8% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Okinawans by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Cypriot (8.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bulgarian (8.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Maltese (8.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |