Bermudan vs Japanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bermudan
Japanese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bermudans
Japanese
18.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Japanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,609,827 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,332,708 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Japanese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 38.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.9% | 99.0% |
Mean | 16.2% | 23.2% |
Median | 16.2% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 26.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bermudans and Japanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Armenia (18.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cambodia (18.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (18.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |