Barbadian vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Scotch-Irish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Scotch-Irish
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Scotch-Irish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,263,328 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 20.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Scotch-Irish |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.8% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 15.3% | 19.2% |
| Median | 14.6% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |