Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Pima
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Pima
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 19.1%.
![Alaskan Athabascan vs Pima Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/alaskan-athabascans-vs-pima-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Pima |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 29.5% |
Range | 23.9% | 25.7% |
Mean | 8.7% | 11.0% |
Median | 7.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Crow (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |