Menominee vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Menominee
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Menominee
Chickasaw
60.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Menominee vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,777,849 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504 and weighted average of 60.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%, a difference of 2.8%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Menominee | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 39.5% | 28.7% |
Maximum | 67.4% | 76.1% |
Range | 27.9% | 47.4% |
Mean | 55.8% | 55.2% |
Median | 57.2% | 56.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.8% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.5% | 61.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Menominee and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Native/Alaskan (60.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Apache (60.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Paiute (60.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Crow (60.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Ute (60.9%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 60.6% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 59.8% |