Creek vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Creek
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Creek
Chickasaw
61.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,467,646 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 61.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 22.8% | 28.7% |
Maximum | 82.0% | 76.1% |
Range | 59.2% | 47.4% |
Mean | 52.6% | 55.2% |
Median | 53.3% | 56.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.6% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.7% | 61.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.0% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (61.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Dutch West Indian (61.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Ute (60.9%, a difference of 0.71%), Cajun (61.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and Sioux (61.8%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |