Immigrants vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Immigrants
Chickasaw
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,773,674 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 65.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 62.3%, a difference of 5.0%.
![Immigrants vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age > 16](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/in-labor-force-16-and-over/immigrants-vs-chickasaw-in-labor-force-16-and-over-chart.webp)
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 37.9% | 28.7% |
Maximum | 88.4% | 76.1% |
Range | 50.5% | 47.4% |
Mean | 64.5% | 55.2% |
Median | 65.2% | 56.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.5% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.5% | 61.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.25%), American (62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Ottawa (62.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |