Creek vs Subsaharan African Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Creek
Subsaharan African
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Creek
Sub-Saharan Africans
27.1%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.8%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Subsaharan African Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,368,499 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,315,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 22.8%, a difference of 18.9%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.99% | 0.79% |
| Maximum | 60.1% | 45.6% |
| Range | 59.1% | 44.8% |
| Mean | 29.8% | 20.1% |
| Median | 28.9% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.0% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.6% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Wage/Income Gap
Demographics Similar to Creek by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Europe (27.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 4.9 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 4.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (22.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (22.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Fijian (22.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Guatemalans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 22.6% |
| Central American Indians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 22.7% |
| Menominee | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 22.7% |
| Indonesians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 22.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 22.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 22.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 22.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 22.8% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 22.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 22.9% |
| Africans | 99.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 22.9% |
| Nigerians | 99.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 23.0% |