Zimbabwean vs Pima Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Pima
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Zimbabweans
Pima
27.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Pima Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,170,412 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 27.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,534,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Pima |
Minimum | 13.4% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 44.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 31.3% | 36.2% |
Mean | 28.6% | 29.2% |
Median | 28.1% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 35.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are European (27.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American Indian (27.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 97.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Arabs | 97.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 28.0% |
South American Indians | 96.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 96.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Pakistanis | 96.0 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Central American Indians | 95.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Zimbabweans | 95.6 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Europeans | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 93.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 27.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Ecuadorians | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 90.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 27.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |