Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Pima
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Pima
27.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
21.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Pima Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,939,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 27.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,534,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 27.1%, a difference of 0.56%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Pima |
Minimum | 8.8% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 49.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 40.7% | 36.2% |
Mean | 27.1% | 29.2% |
Median | 26.8% | 27.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.9% | 21.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.4% | 35.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Pima by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Kiowa (27.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (27.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Micronesia (27.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Haitian (27.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Poland (27.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Greek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Kiowa | 22.2 /100 | #203 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 21.6 /100 | #204 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 20.3 /100 | #205 | Fair 27.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 27.2% |
Haitians | 19.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |