Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,703,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,235,396 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.010%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tohono O'odham	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Minimum	8.1%	12.1%
Maximum	69.3%	44.7%
Range	61.2%	32.6%
Mean	33.2%	29.5%
Median	30.8%	28.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	27.2%	26.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	38.3%	33.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.1%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.1%	5.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.9%	5.6%

Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%