Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Average Family Size
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Iroquois
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Iroquois
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,605 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 3.16. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 3.16, a difference of 0.080%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.95 | 1.73 |
Maximum | 3.84 | 4.68 |
Range | 1.89 | 2.95 |
Mean | 3.03 | 3.07 |
Median | 3.13 | 3.10 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.79 | 2.82 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.29 | 3.34 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50 | 0.52 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.44 | 0.50 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.43 | 0.50 |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Iroquois by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Germany (3.15, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (3.16, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (3.16, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (3.15, a difference of 0.040%), and New Zealander (3.15, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Greece (3.16, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (3.16, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (3.16, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Singapore (3.16, a difference of 0.050%), and American (3.16, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Turks | 1.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.16 |
Potawatomi | 1.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Albania | 1.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 1.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Russia | 1.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 1.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.16 |
Americans | 1.0 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | South Africa | 0.9 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.16 |
Iroquois | 0.8 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.16 |
Maltese | 0.8 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Singapore | 0.7 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.16 |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.16 |
Immigrants | Germany | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 0.6 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.15 |
New Zealanders | 0.6 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Belgium | 0.6 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.15 |
Cambodians | 0.6 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.15 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.5 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.15 |
Swiss | 0.5 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.15 |
Okinawans | 0.5 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.15 |