Portuguese vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Portuguese
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Portuguese
Chickasaw
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
77.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,747,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Portuguese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 14.0% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 62.8% |
Range | 23.5% | 56.3% |
Mean | 26.3% | 27.4% |
Median | 26.7% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.4% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Argentinean (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Osage (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Menominee (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Brazilians | 79.6 /100 | #144 | Good 27.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 27.7% |
Basques | 79.5 /100 | #146 | Good 27.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |