Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Currently Married
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
42.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
52.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,977,387 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760 and weighted average of 42.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,813,548 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 46.7%, a difference of 9.0%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 19.1% | 27.1% |
Maximum | 53.7% | 72.3% |
Range | 34.6% | 45.2% |
Mean | 38.9% | 50.5% |
Median | 41.0% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 44.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 57.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Aleut (46.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 64.2 /100 | #164 | Good 46.9% |
Samoans | 59.8 /100 | #165 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Syria | 59.3 /100 | #166 | Average 46.8% |
Spaniards | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 58.2 /100 | #168 | Average 46.8% |
Armenians | 58.2 /100 | #169 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 46.7% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |