Iroquois vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Iroquois
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Iroquois
Chickasaw
44.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,297,556 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254 and weighted average of 44.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 4.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 14.1% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 68.4% |
Range | 52.6% | 40.9% |
Mean | 44.5% | 48.9% |
Median | 46.1% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.7% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.2% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (44.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Alaskan Athabascan (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Cuban (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Seminole (44.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Spanish Americans | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 45.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 45.0% |
Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |