Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chickasaw
36.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,730,067 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357 and weighted average of 36.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 26.7%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 57.6% | 68.4% |
| Range | 51.4% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 32.0% | 48.9% |
| Median | 35.6% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Hopi (36.5%, a difference of 0.58%), Pima (35.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |