Immigrants from Ecuador vs Nepalese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Nepalese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Nepalese
33.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
7.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Nepalese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,926,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 33.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,298,427 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182 and weighted average of 33.5%, a difference of 0.64%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Nepalese |
Minimum | 18.0% | 9.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.3% |
Range | 82.0% | 55.0% |
Mean | 39.2% | 33.5% |
Median | 33.6% | 30.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.8% | 25.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.7% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Nepalese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Alsatian (33.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Portuguese (33.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Spaniard (33.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Malaysian (33.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (33.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Spaniard (33.6%, a difference of 0.24%), French (33.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |
Portuguese | 5.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 33.8% |
Malaysians | 5.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 33.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 33.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 34.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 34.0% |
Spanish | 4.0 /100 | #225 | Tragic 34.1% |
Delaware | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 34.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 34.2% |