Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hawaiian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Hawaiian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Hawaiians
33.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
11.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hawaiian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,926,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 33.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,224,673 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 33.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hawaiian |
Minimum | 18.0% | 8.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.0% | 91.1% |
Mean | 39.2% | 42.0% |
Median | 33.6% | 31.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.8% | 29.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.7% | 52.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.0% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Hawaiians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Alsatian (33.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Portuguese (33.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Spaniard (33.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Malaysian (33.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (33.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |
Portuguese | 5.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 33.8% |
Malaysians | 5.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 33.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 33.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 34.0% |