Hopi vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Hopi
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Hopi
Sub-Saharan Africans
36.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,739,770 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hopi and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486 and weighted average of 36.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 16.5%.
![Hopi vs Subsaharan African Currently Married](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/currently-married/hopi-vs-sub-saharan-africans-currently-married-chart.webp)
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hopi | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 64.0% | 84.5% |
Range | 61.9% | 82.7% |
Mean | 32.7% | 40.3% |
Median | 32.0% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.6% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Hopi by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Tohono O'odham (36.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Pima (35.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 3.5%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.8% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |