Icelander vs Comanche Family Households
COMPARE
Icelander
Comanche
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Icelanders
Comanche
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Comanche Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,626,619 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 63.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.33%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Comanche |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 47.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.0% | 52.6% |
| Mean | 69.1% | 69.1% |
| Median | 67.3% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 63.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.1% | 73.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Comanche by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |