Creek vs Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Creek
Choctaw
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Creek
Choctaw
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,635,203 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 36.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 90.9% |
| Mean | 50.2% | 53.2% |
| Median | 45.8% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.5% | 36.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.2% | 63.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.7% | 26.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 22.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Choctaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Mexican (36.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Cree (37.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Barbados (36.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Barbadian (37.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Congo (36.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 36.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 36.9% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 37.1% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 37.1% |
| West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |