Costa Rican vs Malaysian Family Households
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Malaysian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Costa Ricans
Malaysians
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Malaysian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.090%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 41.4% | 27.8% |
| Maximum | 89.7% | 93.6% |
| Range | 48.2% | 65.8% |
| Mean | 68.7% | 66.8% |
| Median | 68.7% | 65.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.6% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 71.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Malaysians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |