Chippewa vs Immigrants from Australia Family Households
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Australia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Australia
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Australia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,146,773 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 61.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 25.0% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.0% | 69.0% |
| Mean | 65.2% | 60.9% |
| Median | 63.9% | 61.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.0% | 55.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.6% | 67.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from France (61.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ethiopian (61.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (61.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Kiowa (61.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (61.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
| Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 61.1% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.9% |
| Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 60.9% |