Spanish American vs Subsaharan African GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Spanish American
Subsaharan African
GED/Equivalency
GED/Equivalency Comparison
Spanish Americans
Sub-Saharan Africans
83.6%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.2%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
3.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Subsaharan African GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,168,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169 and weighted average of 83.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,215,958 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 84.2%, a difference of 0.72%.
GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 47.7% | 56.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.3% | 43.1% |
Mean | 82.7% | 83.4% |
Median | 84.3% | 84.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 78.5% | 80.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.0% | 85.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Bahamian (83.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Comanche (83.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Creek (83.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Shoshone (83.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Crow (83.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Peru (84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ghanaian (84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eritrea (84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (84.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (84.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 84.3% |
Ghanaians | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 84.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 3.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 84.2% |
Immigrants | Peru | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 84.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 2.6 /100 | #239 | Tragic 84.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 84.1% |
Senegalese | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 84.0% |
Sri Lankans | 1.9 /100 | #242 | Tragic 84.0% |
Cherokee | 1.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 83.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 83.9% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.2 /100 | #245 | Tragic 83.8% |
Chickasaw | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 83.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 1.1 /100 | #247 | Tragic 83.8% |
Blackfeet | 1.1 /100 | #248 | Tragic 83.8% |
Crow | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 83.8% |
Shoshone | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 83.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 83.6% |
Bahamians | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 83.6% |
Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 83.6% |
Creek | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 83.6% |