Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Thailand Vision Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Immigrants from Thailand
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Immigrants from Thailand
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
42.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Thailand Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,772,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,876,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 6.1% | 7.7% |
| Range | 5.3% | 7.3% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Thailand by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
| Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |