Polish vs Immigrants from Mexico Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Mexico
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Mexico
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Mexico Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 26.4% |
Range | 45.5% | 25.1% |
Mean | 9.1% | 6.9% |
Median | 6.6% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Mexico by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |