Malaysian vs Subsaharan African Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Subsaharan African
Disability
Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Sub-Saharan Africans
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Subsaharan African Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,067,054 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,103,774 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.68%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.5% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 29.0% | 45.5% |
Range | 27.5% | 38.9% |
Mean | 14.0% | 14.4% |
Median | 12.9% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Italian (12.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Samoan (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Carpatho Rusyn (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |