Israeli vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Israelis
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,174,000 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.662 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 9.0%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 40.3% |
| Range | 23.1% | 38.0% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 18.5% |
| Median | 14.7% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Norway (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Lebanese (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% |
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |