Immigrants from Japan vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Sub-Saharan Africans
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,148,832 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 9.8%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 52.8% | 40.3% |
Range | 50.2% | 38.0% |
Mean | 17.2% | 18.5% |
Median | 15.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Inupiat (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Korean (16.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |