Immigrants from Malaysia vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,973,854 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 8.3%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.5% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 33.4% | 40.3% |
Range | 29.9% | 38.0% |
Mean | 16.4% | 18.5% |
Median | 15.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% |
French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% |
Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |