Immigrants from Thailand vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Choctaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,876,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 48.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Choctaw |
Minimum | 0.34% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 7.7% | 15.8% |
Range | 7.3% | 15.5% |
Mean | 2.5% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |