Cheyenne vs Choctaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Cheyenne
Choctaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Cheyenne
Choctaw
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Choctaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,705,474 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 6.6%.
![Cheyenne vs Choctaw Vision Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/vision-disability/cheyenne-vs-choctaw-vision-disability-chart.webp)
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cheyenne | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 15.8% |
Range | 13.4% | 15.5% |
Mean | 4.6% | 6.0% |
Median | 4.1% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne and Choctaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Cajun (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Seminole (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |