Immigrants from Switzerland vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Ugandan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Ugandans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,074,986 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Ugandan |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 14.2% |
Range | 11.6% | 12.8% |
Mean | 5.9% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland and Ugandans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Peruvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |