Immigrants from Switzerland vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Switzerland
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Switzerland
Creek
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Switzerland vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,074,986 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.255 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 49.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Switzerland | Creek |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 30.8% |
Range | 11.6% | 28.5% |
Mean | 5.9% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.4% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Switzerland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |