Immigrants from Middle Africa vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
New Zealander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
New Zealanders
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,904,660 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
![Immigrants from Middle Africa vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/immigrants-from-middle-africa-vs-new-zealanders-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 17.7% |
Range | 19.7% | 16.2% |
Mean | 6.4% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and New Zealanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |