Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Macedonian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Macedonian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Macedonians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Macedonian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,658,712 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Macedonian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 10.7% |
Range | 19.7% | 9.1% |
Mean | 6.4% | 5.9% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.93% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Macedonians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |