Immigrants from Guatemala vs British Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
British
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
British
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs British Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,192,086 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.14%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | British |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 13.0% | 99.1% |
Mean | 6.2% | 13.1% |
Median | 6.1% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and British by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |