Immigrants from Guatemala vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Australians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,192,086 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Australian |
Minimum | 0.59% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 15.8% |
Range | 13.0% | 13.3% |
Mean | 6.2% | 6.9% |
Median | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |